Ambush at World Youth Day

 

Tim Pemble-Smith

 

Some decisions are high risk, even a recipe for trouble.  That of the Catholic Church to involve itself with the “youth” themed “Jesus Walks” exhibition at World Youth Day was one such decision.  It saw the privileging of “appeal to youth” ahead of common sense and ultimately the church’s own values.  As a result, the church opened itself up to a substantial, albeit variegated re-run of an embarrassing episode from 2006, the “Crisis, Catharsis and Contemplation” exhibition in Melbourne’s St Patrick’s cathedral.

 

Coinciding with the Australian release of the movie of Dan Brown’s “Da Vinci Code”, the staging of “Crisis, Catharsis and Contemplation” had seen the followers of the “sacred feminine” reveling in their triumph in St Patrick’s, as I noted in Quadrant at the time.  The exhibition had been allowed in St Patrick’s while a scheduled, second showing in the crypt of Sydney’s St Mary’s cathedral was quietly cancelled.  The St Patrick’s debacle - in which themes of “sacrifice, suffering, mental illness and grief” served as camouflage for darker themes of alchemy, magic and occult spirituality - evidenced the growing self-confidence and assertiveness of an underground, neo-pagan-gnostic sub-culture within the Australian church intent on ordinary Catholics accepting their form of spirituality.

 

In the case of Sydney’s “Jesus Walks”, at least two indicators suggested mischief: first, the mere fact of art, a medium with considerable potential for the involvement of the ambiguous, the obscure and the subversive and second the strongly politically correct and tendentious tone of the exhibition.

 

“Jesus Walks”, coinciding with World Youth Day, comprised thirty-three fibreglass statues of the Sacred Heart of Jesus.  The originally identical statues, acquired with sponsor funding, had been painted and artistically “interpreted” by different artists and placed at nine locations around Sydney.  The exhibition was billed as engaging with “the idea of ‘faith’ in the contemporary cultural context.”  “Showcasing” new artistic talent, “Jesus Walks” offered “a channel for creative expression” for young people; it built on “the harmonious basis of Christianity” and encouraged “artists from diverse cultural and religious backgrounds” to participate in “a dialogue with a global audience”.  It would serve to “integrate the artistic and religious experience of pilgrims as a vital part of World Youth Day 2008.”  Per promoter and curator Helena McCarthy, a 23 year old art history graduate, the artists were “Christians and non Christians of a variety of inclinations, and cultural heritages.”  Afterwards, the statues were to be sold for the benefit of Fr Chris Riley’s “Youth Off The Streets” charity, assisting young people dealing with substance abuse, alienation and homelessness.

 

The Sydney-siders who objected to the “Jesus Walks” exhibition were upset by the appearance of Jesus as “Superman”, “Skullface” and a range of other quasi-archetypal figures.  Letters of protest were sent to the cardinal.  The following circulated in Sydney at the time: “A number of you have expressed concern about an art exhibition called Jesus Walks. When I first saw the exhibition in Darling Harbour I concluded some anti-Catholic group was trying to make a statement against World Youth Day by parodying the Sacred Heart. Later I discovered, to my bewilderment, that this exhibition was an official event in the WYD Youth Festival. I share your concerns, and from what I gather a great number of Sydney Catholics and WYD pilgrims do as well. In Darling Harbour I watched the reactions of pilgrims, which varied from surprise, to bemusement, to indignation…One presumes the artists, sponsors and organizers were well meant. There is no evidence to suggest anyone intended to be disrespectful to Our Lord, not to mention sacrilegious.  However, an objective assessment of the overall result leads us to conclude that the statues as they are decorated have nothing to do with Sacred Heart iconography or the Sacred Heart as He is commonly known and venerated in the Catholic Church. Some statues are more or less respectful, while others are in bad taste, bizarre, or downright horrific.”

 

Curator Helena McCarthy has publicly confirmed that the exhibition was intended to be variously “thought provoking”, “provocative” and “reflective”.  The intention to be provocative is evidenced in the hearts of the statues, something overt and yet almost subliminal.   The hearts are constructed so that the crown of thorns around the top of the heart outlines a “carnival” style eye mask and the pierced wound below, the shape of a mouth - with the heart as a whole forming a grimacing, expressive, even comical face.  Though evident when pointed out, the “grimacing face” caricature effect seems simply not to have been perceived by most viewers.  For the artists in the exhibition, the options were simply to go with the caricature, further accentuate it or downplay it.

 

Unlike a typical Sacred Heart statue in which Jesus’ right hand is raised in blessing while the left points to the heart, drawing the eye of the viewer to the heart, with the “Jesus Walks” statues the arms are stretched wide “in welcome”.  In the “Jesus Walks” exhibition, the focus of the viewer is drawn not towards the heart but rather to the statue as a whole, the meaning said to be associated with its decoration and the written descriptive material on the statue base.  Such techniques, which “conceal and reveal” at the same time, are recognized, longstanding forms of artistic practice.  The caricature, “grimacing face” is actually repeated on the welcome page of the exhibition website, this time as a light but distinct grey-scaled graphic, the viewer’s attention again being drawn to the darker “Jesus Walks” title and “click to enter” link.

 

For the vast majority of viewers, the deeper meaning in the works was elusive, with the often opaque, politically correct and tendentious artists’ statements and biographies on the base of the statues yielding limited further insight.  Far from precipitating an engagement with “faith” or an interactive, open “dialogue”, the preponderance of the exhibition was an extended parody of faith in general and the heart of Jesus in particular, as the following overview of some of the works illustrates.

 

n “Jonah” is by Leigh Rigozzi.  Rigozzi says, “Both Jesus and Jonah experience similar crises of faith, only to be brought back from the dead.”  Rigozzi’s is one of the more obvious “grimacing face” Sacred Hearts, painted so as to accentuate the effect.  The title of one of Rigozzi’s comic books, “Te Deum”, is indicative of Rigozzi’s liking for wordplay and irony.  His signature art is about ghouls, zombies and mummies.  Rigozzi’s Jesus has pupil-less eyes.  Rigozzi recently participated in the group exhibition “Post Mortem: Art Death and Illustration”.  Post Mortem billed itself as “an investigation into the realms of an artist’s psyche, carefully extracted and poured onto canvas”.  Rigozzi maintains all his work is an attempt to “filter experience through art”.  If so, ghouls are central to that experience.  Here, a pupil-less Jesus appears as if disinterred: Jesus as Ghoul or Zombie.

 

n “Message of Faith” is by Jason Wing, a Sydney-based painter of Aboriginal, Chinese and Australian heritage.  He says, “With all the modern trappings of inner city life it is easy to neglect one’s faith.  We are constantly bombarded by logos, slogans and images in advertisements which claim to offer us true happiness…I have used..signs, codes and conventions to communicate my message about faith.”  Jason Wing’s Jesus has been aerosol painted black.  Jesus holds an LED display in front of himself.  The message on the photograph of the black framed LED display on the website, in red lettering, is “FAITH IS?”  Wing’s art elsewhere references alchemy, including the Chinese variety.  Alchemy is, of course, the “black art”.  The real reason Wing’s Jesus is completely black - body, face and clothes - is because his message concerns alchemy.

 

n “Plasterhouse Jesus” is the work of David Capra.  We are told that Capra “is influenced by Outsider art and contemporary craft practices”.  What this means is not specified on the “Jesus Walks” website.  Elsewhere Capra says, “My work is a combination of nonsense, waffling text, in-jokes and a mixture of the banal with the spectacular.”  As well as the standard “grimacing face” heart, Capra’s Jesus presents a second level of the same kind of effect, a face within a face.  In this second level, a wider face appears, the heart forming a set of thick lips, the flames above the heart, a nose and Jesus’ hair ringlets, a pair of eyes.  Just in case the observer might miss the clever, almost illusionary second effect, it is presented in precisely measured close-up on the “Jesus Walks” website.  As Capra boasts in relation to his art practice, he plays “with the tension and conflict found in the original works of art.”  Capra’s inclinations are known to be more towards magic than grace; his statue witnesses to parody and his own craftiness.

 

n “Embracing All Cultures” is by Issacc Campbell-Cook.  This statue has eighteen hands painted on its front in land rights colours, six black hands, six red hands and six yellow - symbolically 666, the Beast of Revelations, the Anti-Christ.  Per the information provided, the 22 year old Campbell-Cook is of Aboriginal descent, has “recently developed a passion for the art of his heritage” and aims to “illustrate that all cultures can live in harmony.  In order to have faith in ourselves we must have faith in each other.”  Taken together, the statue as painted and the accompanying text are an emphatic contradiction.  This is, of course, not the first occasion where Aboriginal art has been used as a front for something else.

 

n Kill Pixie’s statue is untitled.  His Jesus, another blind, pupil-less figure, presents with a book in his left hand, with Kill Pixie’s own geometric, idiosyncratic, coded figures on the cover.  Forget the bible; Jesus’ new book is the Kill Pixie book.  The relevant coding here relates to “four”: in the cover art of Kill Pixie’s book, four fingers are presented and a four by four geometric coding appears on the face of the main figure.  Numerologically, this is four by four squared, or “four cubed”, a sub-cultural, insider reference to the “divine feminine” and specifically to her genitalia.  “Four cubed” had also been subtly associated with “Icon Chamber (The Visitation)”, a work exhibited in St Patrick’s cathedral in 2006.  Appropriately here, Kill Pixie’s statement about “faith” concerns magic, not grace: “Faith is the concept of a future outcome, believing or projecting positive thoughts into something.”  Kill Pixie’s message here: Jesus has moved on.  It’s magic and the “sacred feminine” now.

 

n “Pwakiyajimirri - go in peace to love and serve one another” is by Josie Tipungwuti.  The artist statement says, “Pwakiyajimirri features overlapping traditional symbols, structures, inherited and environmental representations that are central to Tiwi culture.”  The very contemporary in-joke with this work rests in what is referred to as an “environmental representation” - the white cockatoo feathers attached to the halo on this statue.  A cockatoo (“cock-or-two”) reference to Jesus was also incorporated in the “Crisis, Catharsis and Contemplation” exhibition in St Patrick’s cathedral in Melbourne in 2006.  Further, the elaborate mask painted on the face of Jesus references Tiwi mortuary practices and thus evokes in this work, if not necessarily the proverbial “dead parrot”, then certainly the twin themes of “sex and death” much beloved by spiritual and artistic sub-cultures.

 

n “There is no justice, just us” is by Brett Chan.  His aerosol painted Jesus is metallic, impersonal and blind, with no pupils in his eyes and with a notably “grimacing face” heart.  Brett is concerned that “we have exerted dominance on this planet that is in total contrast with the ordinance of nature.  As the thread of that false reality unravels, will humans be motivated to adapt to redeem our actions?  Amidst such enormity, there must be some form of faith.”  Brett Chan does not specify what form that faith will take, nor does he inform us that he is a “future primitive”.  Future primitives seek to “recover an essential process which should take place within each person…What can endure must emerge from Gaia (mother earth, if you prefer), from the living planet.”  The essential process to be recovered is of course Gnostic.  Brett Chan has no time for the conventional Jesus, his “just us” message leaving little room for any “form of faith” other than earth-based.

 

The same caricature, “grimacing face” hearts were supplied to all the artists in the “Jesus Walks” exhibition, which was sponsored by a range of businesses, organisations and individuals.  Following the end of World Youth Day, the statues were sold at an auction in the forecourt of St Mary’s cathedral and reportedly about $130,000 raised for Fr Chris Riley’s “Youth Off The Streets” charity.  The mix of aware and unaware artists, sponsors and buyers is an open question.  One buyer is known to have acquired statues with the intention of putting them out of circulation or of repairing them.

 

The exhibition had without question resonated at a musical level for some young people.  The title “Jesus Walks” is the name of a song by controversial rapper Kanye West.  West, who claims Christian status, is well known among other things for his explicit, at times apparently self-loathing and self-professedly “crass” lyrics.  He once appeared as Jesus wearing a crown of thorns on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine.  “Jesus Walks” won the 2005 Grammy for best rap song.  West has released no less than three separate videos of “Jesus Walks”, the third reaching No. 8 on Much Music’s 50 Most Controversial Videos List.  The song contains a vocal sample of “(Don’t Worry) If There’s a Hell Below, We’re All Going to Go” performed by Curtis Mayfield.  West admits to being calculating in his work: “I contradict myself.  I am large, I contain multitudes”.  Relating as it does to Kanye West and his song, the title “Jesus Walks” inevitably conveys a confusing and contradictory resonance for at least a section of the youth audience.

 

A point made publicly a number of times by curator Helena McCarthy also references another key, musical connection: “‘It was a bit of pub trivia actually, there are so many people who don’t know what the 33 represents’, she said.  ‘Christ died at the age of 33, so it was taking Christ to the streets.’”  Helena McCarthy’s emphasis on “33” invokes yet another song which resonates for those familiar with the “alternative rock” genre: “33”, by American group The Smashing Pumpkins.  “33” appeared in their nine times platinum, Grammy nominated album “Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness”.  In music circles, there has been much discussion that the title “33” may be a reference to Jesus.  Interestingly, the subject of “walking” is also a theme in “33”: “the earth laughs beneath my heavy feet / at the blasphemy in my old jangly walk”.  “33’s” lyrics reference “the streets”, as did Helena McCarthy’s comment above.  “33” also references journeying “here and there and back again”, which parallels Satan’s evasive answer to God about his activities in Job, “going to and fro on the earth” and “walking back and forth on it”.

 

Ultimately, what distinguishes Kanye West’s “Jesus Walks” and “33” is that both are taken as involving “Jesus” and “walking” and both are taken as referencing Jesus in a calculatedly confusing and cynical manner.  This was the message of the music, as imputed to the “Jesus Walks” exhibition and, as seen earlier, this is what the exhibition itself did.

 

From 2006 to 2008, the common template for Melbourne’s “Crisis, Catharsis and Contemplation” and Sydney’s “Jesus Walks” was:

  1. Invite a range of artists to participate in an exhibition exploring themes in a spiritual context, (cathedral “sacred space” in Melbourne; “faith” in Sydney);
  2. Incorporate controversial, multi-layered art works, calculated to provoke a reaction and covertly referencing Gnostic and neo-pagan themes;
  3. Ensure the key symbolism and meanings are sufficiently obscure and elusive to provide at least a fig leaf of deniability for organizers and artists;
  4. Incorporate politically correct and tendentious explanatory information, clueing in the sub-culturally aware while fueling the provocation of others;
  5. Make it clear publicly that the exhibition is meant to “challenge” and/or provoke.  Robustly maintain this position in the face of inevitable objections;
  6. Bullet-proof exhibition and organisers with concern for the disadvantaged;
  7. Use that concern to leverage support and sponsorship;
  8. Include “four cubed” and “cockatoo”, with care and discretion;
  9. Steer and work through a young curator as front person, with the more experienced insiders discreetly in the shadows; and
  10. Provide web-based exposure for the benefit of the widespread and dispersed sub-cultural networks, locally and overseas.

 

Naturally, as with a virus, the template is “evolving”.  The “Jesus Walks” web presence was more sophisticated, particularly in its use of “conceal and reveal” techniques.  Whereas the artworks used in Melbourne had been contemporary, the “welcoming” Sydney statues appeared more traditional and comparatively “safe”.  The revealing, dog-whistling catalogue used in Melbourne was dispensed with entirely.  Some better known, older artists had been included in Melbourne, their longer public records in the arts materially assisting in establishing the artistic methodology and meaning in their works.  The Sydney exhibition was distributed across nine sites and not easy to access or assess in its entirety.  The organizing body for the Melbourne exhibition, Carnivale Christi, had been discredited.  Using Carnivale Christi in Sydney in 2008 would no doubt have been problematic, although Helena McCarthy has been associated with Carnivale Christi and used the Carnivale Christi post office box for “Jesus Walks”.

 

Whatever may be said about the organisers, it is clear that the exhibition formula always was going to deliver trouble.  Inviting a range of people from the arts to freely and “creatively express” themselves on a sacred icon or in a cathedral is reflective of a certain, not readily explicable vulnerability on the part of the Australian Catholic church.  The parallel, on-going failure of the church to deal with those within its ranks who engage in subversive activities bemuses many Australians.  Clearly, there is an element of systemic disorder.  Whether it be, for example, the Womenspace and Earthlink organizations and the rebellious parish of St Mary’s in Brisbane or Earthsong and “Crisis, Catharsis and Contemplation” in Melbourne, the apparent inattention or inaction of much of the hierarchy are palpable.  As recent events in Melbourne confirm, a church weakened by failure to confront dissident internal elements is incapable of projecting influence in the wider sphere.

 

The “Jesus Walks” methodology was that of an ambush.  Nonetheless, the ambiguity, obscurity and at times sheer ugliness of the “Jesus Walks” art, the political correctness and tendentiousness of many of the artists’ biographies and statements, the connections of the organizers - all were in the end there to be seen.  Even without the protests of the local Catholics, any of these indicators should have been sufficient to bring the exhibition to attention.  Proceeding as it did in Sydney, “Jesus Walks” appears to have been the product of not so much a lack of authority in the church as a want in discernment.

 

Tim Pemble-Smith writes on culture, art and religion.  His “News From The Pews” website is www.nftp.org.au.  The “Jesus Walks” website is www.jesuswalksart.com.


BACK TO FIRST PAGE