The 
Person 
Paradigm

Primitive Christianity

 

God as Good Kingdom of God Primitive Christianity Personhood Potted Biographies Mythopoeic Web Marketing

The Greek Philosophers

 

The Greek Philosophers and Christianity

Those Christians who assert a functional unity between the Old testament and New Testament, and the Old Testament God and the New Testament God, often deride the influences of Plato or the other Greek Philosophers in the post-Biblical era Christianity.

Greek Philosphy and Gnosticism syncretism?


Many Christians have dismissed the second century Gnostics as syncretists. 

Syncretising the Greek Philosophy with Christianity, and replacing the God of the Old Testament with a Platonic God.  Paving the way for the introduction of neo Platonism into the Church through such people as St Augustine.

These Christians would certainly not countenance the idea that on some fronts the Greek Philosphers may have had a better idea of the heart of true God than the Jews.

Lets look at the issue from a different perspective.


If you were to ask Christians for the key distinctive teaching of Jesus during his earthly ministry, what would it be?

What is the one element of Jesus teaching that stands out?

I would suggest that for most Christians the answers would be Jesus teaching of loving your enemies,  'turning the other cheek' and not returning evil for evil.

Turning the other cheek

It will not surprise you that 'turning the other cheek' is the antithesis of the Old Testament God's Law of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but it may surprise you to find out that 'turning the other cheek' not a foreign to the Greek Philosophers.

In one of Plato's dialogues centuries before Christ, Plato has Socrates pretty well denouncing the foundational paradigm of the Mosaic law:

Soc. And what of doing evil in return for evil, which is the morality of the many-is that just or not?

Cr. Not just.

Soc. For doing evil to another is the same as injuring him?

Cr. Very true.

Soc. Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him. But I would have you consider, Crito, whether you really mean what you are saying. For this opinion has never been held, and never will be held, by any considerable number of persons; and those who are agreed and those who are not agreed upon this point have no common ground, and can only despise one another, when they see how widely they differ. Tell me, then, whether you agree with and assent to my first principle, that neither injury nor retaliation nor warding off evil by evil is ever right...

Plato - Crito 

I would assert that the authoritarian church is the one guilty of syncretism – its not the synchretism of Christianity with Platonism, its the synchretism of Christianity and Judaism.

The Coming of Christ is not just to fulfil the hopes and aspirations of one tiny nation.

The Gospel of Matthew clearly states that it was the adherents of a foreign mystery school (The Magi) not the Jewish religious leaders who recognised the coming of Jesus for what it was.


 

Early Christianity 

 
  Primitive Christianity

Paul vs James


Rehabilitating Marcion

Justin Martyr vs Aristides

Marcion and Pauls Letters

Rehabilitating Valentinus

'agape' love definition

Ancient Baptism

'The kiss of peace'

Mary Magdalene's kiss

The Agapetae

The Body

Tertullian

The Shepherd of Hermas


 
 
 

Contact
Andrew Moore

moorea@ozemail.com.au


official websites queensland

Content Copyright © 1997 - 2007
Andrew Moore
All rights reserved.