Historic Metal Road Bridges

in Victoria

 

 

Gary Vines, Project Consultant (Biosis Research)

Ken McInnes, Institute of Engineers Victorian Heritage Committee

George Deutsch, Deputy Chair Metal Bridges Study Steering Committee

 

 

 

SUMMARY

The study of metal road bridges was commissioned by the National Trust of Australia (Victoria) as a two-stage project. Stage One is intended to establish the parameters and criteria for a thorough assessment of historic metal road bridges in Victoria. It has involved a thematic study of the history of construction of metal road bridges in Victoria; development of criteria for the assessment of the heritage significance of metal road bridges; identification of all metal road bridges of potential cultural significance; and preparation of sample detailed assessments of nine bridges for each category of level of significance. The study has resulted in a far more critical approach to the assessment of significance and has demonstrated the value of quantitative assessment s focussed on the definitive criteria of a specific site type in conjunction with the generic approach of the AHC and Heritage Victoria assessment criteria. 

Stage two is envisaged as a detailed assessment of all significant metal road bridges with the potential to expand the study to cover bridges of other materials as well as rail and foot bridges.


HISTORY

The history of metal road bridges is also the history of settlement and communication in Victoria. The origin of many of the main trunk road routes can be traced back to the period of exploration and pioneer settlement. The tracks of explorers and squatters- Hume, Mitchell, Henty became the main roads, and the fords over rivers became the sites of settlements and bridges.

In this process, order was implemented by the Darling regulations which determined the direction and form of surveys as Colonial government was imposed.

The pioneering routes were from Melbourne to  Macedon/Kyneton, Geelong, Portland, and the Sydney Road(s), Omeo, and around the bay. The very first track in Melbourne was formed by foot traffic between the initial settlement near Batman’s Hill, and the wharf at the pool or turning basin. The first bridge in the Port Phillip District was along this route over the Elizabeth Street creek in 1838.

The first Sydney Road followed the ridge near Deep Creek avoiding the boggy clay soils near the Merri Creek. The present direct route between the creeks had the advantage of not requiring any creek crossings before the Divide.

The Port Fairy to Portland route was blazed by Edward Henty in 1839, following the coast and crossing the rivers at their mouths. This subsequently became the ‘Old Coach Road’ later to be superseded by an inland route once bridges were erected. The prosperity (or at least the legal administration) of the Western District was intrinsically tied to Melbourne so that the Geelong-Melbourne route was also well established by the 1830s.

By 1837 there were several established tracks in the Port Phillip District. The Sydney track has been discussed, others included:

·     Melbourne to Bulla, Sunbury and Macedon; 

·     Melbourne to the Maribyrnong at the Solomon’s Ford and then to Geelong;

·     Geelong to Bacchus Marsh and Sunbury

By 1845 these had been augmented by new tracks to outlying areas including:

·     Melbourne around the bay to Sorrento

·     Macedon to Kyneton

·     Geelong to Portland via the Princes Highway route

·     Geelong to Portland via the Midland, Glenelg and Henty Highways

·     Albury south to Omeo and Alberton

By 1855 the Gold Rushes had caused these routes to be further extended and a network of cross-country routes connecting them. The principle goldfield routes continued to focus on Melbourne and other port towns, as the route of diggers and supplies to the gold fields. The route west from Melbourne to Ballarat was pushed through to the South Australian border and a track had been finally cut through the forests and morasses to Gippsland (O’Connor 1985:93).

Probably the most important determinant of the location of bridges was the pre-existence of an existing river crossing at either a ford or a punt.

Punts operated across the Yarra in the late 1830s, William Watts operated one east of Swanston Street in April 1838. Hodgson’s punt, which used a fixed wire cable to haul it across the river, replaced this in 1839. This later became the site of the first permanent bridge in Melbourne and demonstrates a common link between punt and bridge, the Melbourne Bridge Company having taken over the lease for the punt before erecting its bridge. A similar relationship existed with Lynch's Punt and Bridge at Footscray.

The early specification of river crossings as sites for towns by the Surveyor General demonstrates that they were not simply ad hoc developments, but in at least some cases were expressly planned in recognition of the needs of travellers.

The preponderance of towns with ford in their name is just one indication of their importance in the development of settlement and maintenance of communication. Broadford, Batesford, Fyansford, Guildford, Exford, Shelford, etc.

David Lennox’s Return of Public Works (Port Phillip Government Gazette pp 984-986)  provides us with the best summary of the bridges that were constructed in the colony by the government between the beginning of 1846 and end of 1850, prior to the Gold Rushes.

Whilst no metal bridges were constructed in this period, the summary does provides us with an indication of the priorities for allocating government expenditure; the important routes; and the more substantial bridges that were constructed. They included 17 bridges on Sydney Road, six on the Mount Macedon Road, four each on the upper and lower Portland Roads and eight others.

Not included here are the privately constructed bridges of the period, such as the Melbourne Bridge Company’s Balbirnie’s bridge which spanned the Yarra from 1845 to the opening of Lennox’s bridge in 1851.

The most substantial bridgework by far, was Princes Bridge, with a single stone arch span of 150 feet and a total length of 250 feet. The expenditure on this alone was £19,000 compared with the total Roads and Bridges expenditure of £31,474. This was the first major ‘permanent’ bridge built in the Port Phillip District, all other bridges were of Timber (Cannon 1991:110).

The first Princes Bridge lasted about 30 years before the demands of river widening, increasing road traffic, and in particular the installation of cable tramways in Melbourne’s streets, required a new bridge to be erected. The Government commissioned David Munro to build a large stone and iron bridge on the same site at a cost of £140,000. Designers were John H, Grainger, father of the famous composer and Charles D’Ebro. With the new bridge the opportunity was also taken to straighten and widen the approach roads, making a far grander entrance to the city. The new (current) Princes Bridge as it was christened, was opened to traffic in 1888 (Cannon 1991:117).

On Merri Creek north of Melbourne on eof the critical factors in Melbournes Bridge development was found to be the effect of massive floods washing away the low level timber bridges. A stone and timber bridge was erected by contractor Thomas Stephens in 1853-4, assisted in the design by the Inspector of Works of the new Victorian Roads and Bridges Department Thomas Edwin Rosson. Rosson later identified the success of the bridge design in withstanding floods in the wide spacing of the piles allowing debris to be swept through instead of jamming (Cannon 1995; Allan 1939:77-81).

Rosson gave evidence to the Victorian Legislative council Select Committee on Roads and Bridges in 1852, outlining his views of flood proofing bridges and constructing more cheaply by using Tasmanian timber or even local blue gum, which would enable a bridge costing about £2,000, as opposed to £10,000 for a single-span stone bridge. He also suggested that iron girder bridges would be more suitable for flat land, but did not recommend suspension bridges because of danger resulting for use by cattle - presumably the fear of falling from your horse on the slippery surface caused by their fouling the deck (Cannon 1991:118-9).

A ford on the Moonee Ponds Creek at the end of Flemington Road near the Flemington Inn was initially replaced in 1839 by primitive log crossing constructed by James Patrick Main then reconstructed in 1849 with £200 allocated by Lennox. According to Cannon, it was rebuilt as a laminated timber arch at a cost of £492 although an 1851 Sketch by Jarrett, shows it as a as a conventional log pile and beam bridge, while Max Lay notes that it was not a site suitable for an arch bridge. An 1869 report in the Argus describes it as a tumbledown collection of logs.

The timber bridge was replaced with a more substantial cast and wrought iron bridge in 1868. This was to the design of G. Francis incorporating several rows of cast iron columns, each bolted together from two metre long sections and supporting riveted wrought iron girders. It was subsequently maintained by the government and provided a route to the Mt. Alexander District, and a reasonable alternative Sydney route for when Sydney Road became impassable in winter. Although reconstructed several times to incorporate a wide concrete deck on concrete piers, the present bridge retains six rows of cast iron columns, and some of the riveted wrought iron girders (Cannon 1995).

The inconvenience of the natural ford, meant that the punts at Footscray came to play a more important role, and became the location for later bridges. Michael Lynch established a punt and inn at Footscray by 1840, and went about erecting a bridge in about 1866 (Max Lay), despite being refused a permit to do so.  As the river was used by shipping (for the boiling down works at Maribyrnong, and later the gunpowder magazine and meat works) Lynch’s Bridge was constructed with a draw bridge span. It was rebuilt with a horizontal lift span in 1882 to the design of G. Francis, which survived in a modified form into the twentieth century, but was replaced with the new bridge on the Ballarat Road in 1936  This new Lynch’s Bridge was one of the earliest composite steel and concrete bridges erected by the CRB.

 

A steel truss swing bridge was also constructed down stream at Footscray in the 1920s, which lasted into the 1960s. This was a unique bridge for Melbourne in having a lift span to allow passage of ships, an in particular the gunpowder barges heading for the Saltwater River Magazine.

The Plenty River Bridge, erected in about 1861 to the design of G. Francis, is one of the earliest surviving Metal bridges in Victoria, indicating the importance of this route and the productive farmland it served, to the early colony.

The Barwon River formed an obstacle to travel south and west of Geelong. A hotel and ford 3 miles west formed the village of Fyansford, while south of Geelong Town a bridge was put over the Barwon in 1859 to a design of William Fairbairn & Sons of Manchester England. This wrought iron box girder bridge with a 210 foot (64 metre) span which was the longest bridge span in Australia and probably the most substantial engineering works of the time.

The Upper Portland road also came to prominence as the way to the Fiery Creek goldfields and was surveyed by 1852. Shelford has the possible claim to the first bridge in Victoria, erected in 1840 over the Leigh (Yarrowee) River. A more substantial timber bridge was put up in 1851, and this in turn was replaced by the Shire of Leigh in 1873-4 with a design by Shire Engineer, C A C Wilson, and fabricated in situ from components cast by Ballarat founder, John Price. This new bridge comprised two continuous hollow wrought iron girders over three spans and supported on iron rollers attached to bluestone piers and abutments (Alsop 1971).

Further along this route, the Woady Yalloak Creek on the Rokewood Skipton Road had a timber bridge on stone abutments erected by the Central Roads Board by 1856. By the 1880s the timbers had deteriorated to the point the bridge was unsafe, and the Shires of Leigh and Grenville funded repairs. The Leigh shire engineer CAC Wilson, prepared a design, for which he had to obtain Public Works Department approval. The new McMillan’s Bridge incorporated locally made trusses by Humble and Nicholson’s Vulcan Foundry in Geelong manufactured from imported iron.  The existing red sandstone abutments of the 1856 bridge were modified to take the new trusses (Chambers & Churchward 1999).

 

Figure 1: McMillans Bridge in about 1974

A little further west at Pitfield is another similar sized lattice truss bridge on bluestone abutments, which may be earlier than McMillan’s bridge.

 

 

Figure 2: Pitfield Bridge

Another important early wrought iron bridge occurs on the Hamilton Highway route over the Woady Yallock Creek at Cressy. Here, a two span lattice-girder bridge with buckle-plate deck on iron cross-beams and bluestone abutments was constructed in 1880 again using trusses fabricated by Humble and Nicholson. (Vines 1994).

 

 

Figure 3: Cressy Bridge

Together these bridges form a unique collection of early lattice and girder bridges which demonstrate the importance of the Western District route in nineteenth century Victoria.

The importance of routes to the coastal ports of the western district at times eclipsed those to Melbourne. This can be seen in a few surviving structures such as the Wollaston cable suspension bridge at Warrnambool. Wollaston Bridge was erected across the Merri River in 1890 to facilitate access to the Wollaston Estate of noted district pastoralist and public figure, Sir Walter Manifold. The design and construction of this bridge, which consists of a timber deck and superstructure suspended from steel cables anchored across square tapered stone towers to approach abutments, is attributed to Warrnambool contractor D. Dobson. Manifold financed the bridge himself, and it is likely that the choice of a suspension bridge also owes something to him, as the family was quite ostentatious in its displays of wealth.

An early crossing of the Maribyrnong River for traffic to the north west, west and south west was at Keilor. A ford 300 m upstream or the old Calder Highway Bridge was initially used, and one of the names of the site “Werribee Crossing” indicates its early role as a route to Geelong – perhaps when the crossing at Avondale Heights was impassable (Max Lay). The first temporary wooden bridge at Keilor was erected in 1848, being the first bridge on the Maribyrnong but was washed away in a flood in 1852. Its replacement included large Howe truss timber spans to the design of the Acting Colonial Engineer Samuel Brees. However this bridge was soon damaged in further floods and replaced in 1854. It was subsequently repaired in 1857, 1860 and 1866, but still remained close to collapse (Lay). A new bridge was built to the design of George Brown, in 1868 possibly using the abutments of the earlier bridge (O’Connor 1985:111). The Iron Bridge at Keilor is one of the oldest existing metal girder road bridges in the state, only the Hawthorn bridge and the bridges over the Melbourne-Bendigo and Geelong-Ballarat Railways predate it.

 

Clunes and Creswick also lie between Ballarat and Bendigo, and each gained substantial bridge in the late nineteenth century. Jorgenson’s Bridge near Clunes dates from 1874, utilising continuous wrought-iron lattice-girder deck trusses on stone abutments and one pier. The 1896 Creswick Creek bridge is later than most of the wrought iron lattice-girder bridges, but like others, it also replaced an earlier laminated timber arch.

The towns of Heathcote and Kyneton were linked by a gold era road which had a dangerous ford on the Campaspe river near Redesdale. The Shires of Metcalfe and McIvor managed to obtain Public Works Department funding for a new bridge in 1869. This took advantage of the misfortune of the ship carrying ironwork for the Hawthorn bridge which sank in Hobson’s Bay in 1859. The ironwork was salvaged and 200 tons sold to the shires by Langlands & Co for the bargain price of £1,000, T.B. Munz was the engineer supervising construction and the contractor named Doran. The bridge was constructed on a steep and difficult site, with sharply angled approaches and incorporating three wrought-iron lattice-girders in a through-truss configuration on bluestone piers and abutments. Curved wrought iron arches over the two lanes provide lateral stability to the girders (Chambers 1996).

 

Figure 4: Mia Mia Bridge near Redesdale

Another important gold field route, was that between the Ballarat- Maryborough and Avoca districts. The first Glenmona bridge (a laminated timber design) was erected over Bet Bet Creek in 1857. This route also served more distant travellers as an 1853 plan identifies it as the Road from South Australia to Mt. Alexander (Chambers1999).

Roads heading inland from coastal ports generally had an advantage in avoiding river crossings, at least at the lower reaches of rivers. Therefore, substantial bridges could be avoided by route selection. The Crawford River Bridge at Hotspur provided access between Portland and the Western District town of Casterton. Erected in 1870 by local contractor George Jarrett (possibly under direction of Shire engineer J. G. Griffen) it comprises a riveted wrought-iron half-through plate-girder design. It proved the Government inspecting engineer J. Crawley, correct in his judgement that the site required a more expensive iron bridge when it withstood the massive flood in the year it was built and so helped demonstrate the superiority of the type in flood prone situations.

Further proposals for a bluestone bridge were made as early as 1848, but it was not until 1851, that a public timber bridge was erected near the end of Bridge Road becoming only the second bridge crossing on the Yarra River. This was located just to the north of the present alignment, possibly with the intention of allowing space for a more permanent structure, which was duly completed ten years later as a more elaborate stone structure joining Bridge Road to Burwood Road. These bridges opened up the eastern suburbs of Melbourne to settlement, and speculative suburban subdivision during the subsequent boom years (Cannon 1991:117-8). The Hawthorn Bridge had a difficult start, with the first trusses imported from England, sinking to the bottom of Port Phillip Bay. Replacement trusses were then ordered, delaying the bridges construction. It was finally opened in 1861.

In the 1920s when a bitter dispute ensued over funding for repairs or replacement following damage from floods, the Richmond engineer closed the bridge as unsafe. It was reopened 3 days later, and a temporary bridge built downstream the following year. The continuing arguments and shortage of money during the depression led eventually to it being strengthened using in-situ electric arc welding and the timber deck was replaced with concrete. This was under the supervision of Public works Department Chief Engineer G. Kermode (Churchward 2001; Rasmussen 1992).

 

Examples of bridges which represent this process include the Glenmona or Bung Bong bridge, where the original laminated timber arch had been washed away in the serious floods in Central Victoria in September 1870. The earlier 1858 timber bridge designed by Clement Wilkes and built by contractor A. Oughton, was of timber, and although expensive for the time lasted only 12 years.

The replacement bridge was designed by Shire engineer William Woods and built by Messrs Jenking and Lewis for £3,303 using lattice girders supplied by John Price of Ballarat and decking timber came from Mount Cole.

 

Figure 5: Glenmona (Bung Bong Bridge

This can be seen as the prototype for a new series of locally constructed wrought-iron lattice girder deck-truss main road bridges with masonry substructures and timber decks, created specifically to handle the sort of freak floods experienced across Victoria in the Winter and Spring of 1870. The bridge incorporated relatively shallow lattice trusses and a deck truss design to maximise the height above river level. This is believed to be the first of this deck-truss type built as a consequence of the 1870s floods and was probably a result of pressure from Public Works Department engineers for better designed bridges that could cope with the occasional, but devastating super-floods (Chambers 1997; 1999).

The Hotspur Bridge, while similar in many respects to Glenmona, was constructed prior to the floods. However, the Warrnambool-based inspecting engineer considered the site required more than another light timber bridge and recommended the iron and stone bridge as a precaution against further floods. When the 1867 Ellerslie timber, iron and stone composite bridge had survived serious floods, it was used as a model for a replacement bridge at Darlington (the ‘all-timber Elephant Bridge’) over the Mt. Emu Creek (Chambers 1997).

The Castlemaine district had many of its timber bridges washed away in the1870s floods, and then again in 1889. While some post 1870 bridges were adapted to the flood heights by provision of longer strutted timber span designs, after the next floods, government subsidies encouraged shires to build new bridges in composite stone-iron-timber designs. Zeal Bridge near Pennyweight Flat in 1890, is a good example of this phase of bridge building (Chambers 1997).

On some of the largest rivers, bridges used a combination of timber trestle with timber beam spans over the flood plain, and metal girders or trusses, or composite metal/timber trusses, over the river channel where the longer spans were required. For example the Howlong bridge employs Dare Truss incorporating a steel lower chord.

The failure of brittle steel under load and cold conditions on the Kings Bridge, and the catastrophic failure of a span of the West Gate Bridge during construction are classical modern equivalents, where new materials and construction techniques were employed for the first time here.

The opening up of Gippsland to settlement and agriculture initially occurred via costal shipping and the Lakes. Sir John Coode prepared designs for the New Entrance, as well as a canal to link the rail head at Sale to the navigable Lake Wellington via the Thompson and La Trobe Rivers. The road from Sale to Port Albert was the major route through the district at the time, and so a bridge over the Thompson River at Longford had to incorporate an opening span to accommodate the two transport needs. This was designed by John Grainger and constructed in 1881 by local contractor Peter Platt. It involved the erection of a central pier of cylindrical cast iron caissons, on which the opening span rotated. The riveted wrought iron half-through truss is flanked by plate girder spans on each side.

The Select Committee’s main recommendations were for the establishment of a Central Roads Board and District Roads Boards with the responsibility for determining lines of communications, formation of Macadamised roads as the resources of the Government permitted, and the on-going maintenance of roads. Three means of funding these roads were proposed. The Central Roads Board would have direct Government funding, the District Roads Boards would raise revenue through local government and one-for-one government subsidy, and toll fees could be collected by District Roads Boards to fund road maintenance.

The Central Roads Board would be responsible for ‘main roads’ in the colony, which were defined as being the roads to Kilmore (Sydney Road) Bendigo-Echuca, Geelong-Colac, Bacchus Marsh-Portland, Brighton Dandenong-Gippsland. All other roads would be the responsibility of the district boards.

The District Roads Boards constructed roads and bridges to quite varied standards, quality and design, particularly following the demise of the Central Roads Boards in 1857. In some more prosperous and heavily settled areas such as the Western District and the Central Goldfields, quite high standards of construction were achieved. The Central board had the function of approving design and expenditure for roads and bridges and was particularly concerned that the standards of construction were maintained so as to avoid wasteful false economies which had characterised much of the earlier construction work.

The abolition of the Central Roads Board saw some of its functions taken over by the Board of Land and Works, which had responsibility for Public Works and Crown Lands & Survey and later the Railway Department.

One of the roles of the new Commonwealth Government was to provide for national communication. This was set under the Federal Aid Roads Agreement of 1926. This agreement gave greater security of funding for declared state highways, of which there were 1474 miles by 1927. £360,000 per year were allocated from this source to Victoria The Act was amended in 1931 to provide a user pays element through raising revenue via customs and excise duties on motor spirit. However, in the 1930s and 40s funding for roads remained static due to the impact of the depression and then material and labour shortage during the Second World War.

When the Board was able to expend funds in its first decade, it concentrated in on those rural roads, which provided greatest cost-benefit. As a measure of its task, the CRB constructed 86 bridges in the period 1914-20, 46 in concrete and 41 in timber (Norm Butler 2002). In its annual reports, the CRB emphasised the advantages of using permanent materials on economic grounds, with a preference given to concrete. No mention was made of metal bridges and no metal bridges were recorded as being constructed in the period 1914-19 (Norm Butler 2002, CRB Annual Reports, 1914:65; 1917:7).

The central administration permitted a control of standards through experimental work, testing and design specification. For example The CRB pioneered the design and construction of electrically welded steel structures with three particular examples standing out. CRB Annual Reports in 1931 and 1932 describe that the Sunday Creek Bridge near Seymour as the first welded steel truss bridge in the State. McKillop’s Bridge over the Snowy River on the Bonang-Gelantipy Road was constructed in 1931 as an electrically-welded continuous deck steel bridge claimed to be one of the longest welded bridge in the world at the time. McKillop’s Bridge gained notoriety when it was destroyed in a flood  the day before its official opening in January 1934, when floodwaters reached half-way up the trusses, pushing over one pier, dislodging the trusses and washing them down stream. The bridge was subsequently rebuilt (Butler 2002; CRB Annual Reports 1930-34).

The massive increase in motor traffic began in the 1920s, slowed in the depression and war years, and then took off again following the war. Road freight became the prominent road planning issue as railways declined. Road bridge construction developed new design parameters in order to accommodate the greater speed, volume and weight of this new traffic. Bridge designers responded by making greater use of metal joists in timber bridges, and eventual replacing most of the timber with new steel and concrete designs.

Another reason for this move was the difficulty in obtaining satisfactory timber for the main beams in timber bridges from the 1930s. to solve this, the Board adopted the practice of using steel rolled steel joists instead of round timber stringers. Many bridges were constructed in this manner with timber substructure, steel stringers, timber crossbeams and a timber running deck. To maximise the length obtainable with available RSJ sizes, the stringers were often welded or splice bolted at quarter points to make a continuous

From the 1930s to 1950s the CRB built many composite bridges employing concrete or  timber abutments and piers, RSJs for the main beams and timber decks. An early example of the composite RSJ and timber deck bridge was the Hume Highway Bridge constructed over Goulburn River at Seymour by the CRB in 1933 (CRB Annual Report 1933).  Cheynes Bridge of 1947, built by the CRB on the Licola Road, was a late example of the type which had become a typical form of country bridge in the 1930s. By the post WWII period, pre cast concrete was a more common CRB bridge type and cast in place flat concrete slab had also become popular (Butler 2002; Chambers 1996a).

 

 

Figure 6: Cheynes Bridge Licola

Norm Butler notes that the first composite concrete and steel bridge deck in the State was built by the Country Roads Board at Chinaman’s Creek at Broadford in 1934. This structure utilised “rods bonding the steel joists and the concrete” (shear connectors) to provide a design that was more economical in the use of steel. The work embodied “a new idea recently developed by the Tasmanian Public Works Department.” Due to the proportionally high costs of the fabrication of the shear connectors, the Board at the time decided that overall it was not economic to use this system. Twenty years later, however, when steel was in short supply, this method became (and still is) the accepted system for steel and concrete bridge deck construction” (Butler 2002).

The super elevated Ferguson’s Bridge built by the CRB in 1939 over the Campaspe River, and which incorporated a banked, curved deck designed to take the greater speeds of motorised traffic, represents another aspect of the design trend for motor vehicles. However, super-elevation in itself was practiced from very early days, being a carryover from railways practice. An early example of super Elevation is the Wodonga Creek Hume Highway Bridge of 1933 (Butler 2002; CRB Annual Report 1934:21).

spans and 290 feet long was constructed on the Woolsthorpe Caramut Rd over the Merri River in 1949, the first such structure built in Victoria

A significant large span composite concrete and steel plate girder structure was constructed by the CRB on the Maroondah Highway at Bonnie Doon in the early 1950s to provide for the raised water level of the Eildon Weir (Lake Eildon)

The Spencer Street Bridge was constructed in 1928-30 following an Act of Parliament of 28 September 1927, but the Board of Land and Works Railway Construction Branch, and opened on 12 February 1930. Designed by CH Perrin and W D Chapman, the bridge employed arched variable depth plate girders and cast iron balustrades intended to match those on the existing Prince’s and Queens Bridges.

The King Street Bridge, Kings Way and the associated Flinders Street Overpass of 1961, was perhaps the first example of major grade separation bridge in Victoria. However, it did not include the on and off ramps, which came soon after with full freeway construction such as the Maltby Bypass and South Eastern Freeway. King Street Bridge also gained notoriety when only a year old, on a cold morning, a girder failed due to metal fatigue and stress resulting in the partial collapse of a section of the roadway. The subsequent Royal Commission found that the cause of the collapse was inadequate contract co-ordination, supervision and deficient systems for testing of the steel (Anderson 1994:190-98).

Other programs of road widening and level crossing elimination were also well underway in the 1960s. Some of the earliest were the overpasses at Heathmont, Dandenong Frankston Road, Barry Road Broadmeadows, Princes Highway Corio and Heidelberg Road Clifton Hill, all commenced in 1958 (CRB Annual Report). The design requirements for these bridges poised some unusual engineering problems. Grades on approach embankments had to accommodate the generally underpowered vehicles of the time. This was not always successful, as for example, “Mount Mistake” on the Geelong

The 1961 rail overpass at Craigieburn on the Hume Highway, was possibly the first dual carriageway controlled access road and a precursor to the first freeway, the Maltby By-pass.

 

A significant change in bridge design came as a result of the work of the research and experimental work of Melbourne University Engineering Department. In particular Professor William Charles Kernot was influential in his work on bridge truss design and advocate of light, well-designed, scientific construction, which gave cheaper and better results. He arrived in Australia in 1851 studied at the University of Melbourne and worked in the Victorian Department of Mines and Water Supply Office, before becoming Lecturer and then Australia’s first Professor of Engineering 1868-1909. He was President of the Victorian Institution of Engineers, The Victorian Institute of Surveyors and The Royal Society of Victoria 1885-1900. He is commemorated by the Kernot Medal for distinguished engineering achievement in Australia.

Figure 7: William Charles Kernot.

Charles Anthony Corbett Wilson was an important figure in the history of bridge building in Victoria. Wilson was born in London in 1827 and articled in 1846 to a London engineering firm. He arrived in Victoria in 1851, enticed to the gold diggings which proved unsuccessful. He carried out the original survey for the Geelong to Melbourne Railway and was employed in the construction of the original Iron Barwon Bridge at Geelong and the Shelford Bridge. He later expressed a debt to the training he received there under Charles Rowand. Wilson practised his profession for an incredible sixty-four years (1846-1910) and was responsible for many iron, timber and concrete bridges in western Victoria. He was succeeded by his son Charles Corbett Powell Wilson as shire engineer on his retirement.

In the twentieth century, bridge engineering was pushed forward on several fronts. In this regard John Monash was particularly influential albeit as a reinforced concrete design engineer. However, he certainly helped to have new ideas accepted in bridge design.

Due recognition should also be given to the Country Roads Board in its influence on bridge design and construction in the State. From a policy point of view, William Calder, the first Chairman, should be recognised for his view that more permanent materials should be used for bridge construction, timber being only used where other materials were well out of the question.  Other significant CRB bridge designers/constructors would include DV Darwin (Later Chairman of CRB), and I J O’Donnell(also later Chairman of CRB). More research needs to be done in this area to recognise the significant contribution made.

 

 

o                 Political themes – colonial control, district councils, central roads board, district roads board – councils, PWD, CRB, MMBW.

o                 Influence of engineers – Wilson, Kernot, Coane, Perrin, Calder, Darwin

 

·        Bridge building phases

o                 Pioneering – 40 all timber bridges - Lennox & others, some with stone abutments, + Princes Bridge

o                 Gold Rush – Stone &timber/stone, 100+ in 1850s, many stone bridges survive (Axedale, Djerriwarrh, Avenel, Yendon)

o                 Boom – 1860s to 80s railway boom, engineering experimentations

=      Crimea bridges and Box Girders (Church St. Barwon, Keilor)

=      Lattice Girders (Hawthorn, Mia Mia,)

=      Open Web truss (McMillans, Pitfield)

=      Rarities (Cast Iron, W.I Arch)

o                 CRB standardisation (composites, RSJ)

 

Survey Method

 

·        Data Acquisition

o                 VicRoads, Bridge Inspection System

o                 National Tryst Timber Bridges Study

o                 Statutory Lists – Victorian Heritage Register, Heritage Inventory, Register of the National Estate, NRE Historic Places, National Trust, Heritage Overlays

o                 Heritage Studies and histories

o                 Field Survey

 

Recording and assessment

·        VicRoads images (remote inspection)

·        Existing studies

·        Field inspection along 4 main routes

o               Upper and Middle Portland Roads

o               Western Goldfields

o               North West

o               Gippsland

 

Analysis of results

·        3609 Bridges on database (most timber and metal)

·        2068 Metal road bridges

·        300 Identified of significance Local, Regional, State OR National

·        60 Structural / functional types / Groups,

·        25 Structural / functional classes (incomplete)

·        9 Metal road bridge classes

Analysis of data on metal bridges within the database demonstrates that while a wide range of structural types are represented in Victoria, the vast majority of metal road bridges are relatively modern structures of standard span lengths and designs employing universal beams or rolled steel joists. This is a factor of the exponential increase in bridge replacement and construction in the second half of the twentieth century. Geographic considerations such as the limited number of significant and difficult crossings, and the dispersed nature of the road system are also influential. Australian road bridge technology was also able to draw more extensively on overseas precedents in the post World War II period, which meant a lower level of experimentation and innovation was required.

 

Bridges were divided into 60 structural groups according to their function, materials and design. These can be summarised under 17 major classes. The distribution of bridges according to main structural groups is shown in Error! Reference source not found. and Error! Reference source not found. below. The More Comprehensive listing of Groups is included in Error! Reference source not found. in the Appendices of this report.

It should be noted that in Error! Reference source not found. shows numbers of bridges in each class on a logarithmic scale, in order to present the data for widely variable classes. Most of the all-timber bridges on the National Trust Bridges Database have been excluded from this listing, although those classes for timber bridges are included where metal components form significant structural elements. The listing for timber bridges includes a total of 793 timber beam road bridges of which 63 incorporate some metal components, either steel deck, cross-beams or relieving beams.

 


Bridge Structural Classes

 

Class

Description

#

Date Range

0

Demolished & replaced bridges

27

1936 - 1993

I

Miscellaneous (possibly part timber) road bridges

37

1920 - 1991

II

Timber beam road bridges

793

1863 - 1998

III

Miscellaneous steel road bridges

199

1875 - 1994

IV

UBM/RSJ steel beam road bridges

1499

1870 - 2000

V

Riveted metal plate girder road bridges

110

1860 - 1985

VI

Riveted metal truss road bridges

26

1861 - 1953

VIIa

Welded steel plate girder road bridges

116

1919 - 1994

VIIb

Welded steel truss road bridges

12

1922 - 1995

VIII

Timber truss road bridges

12

1894 - 1933

IXa

Suspension road bridges

2

1890 - 1935

IXb

Metal arch road bridges

2

1870 - 2000

XI

Metal girder foot, stock & pipe bridges

9

1993 - 1998

XII

Metal truss foot, stock & pipe bridges

7

1863 - 1995

XIX

UBM/RSJ steel beam railway bridges

3

1902 - 1919

XX

Riveted metal plate girder railway bridges

19

1861 - 1930

XXI

Metal truss railway bridges

7

1884 - 1928

XXIV

Metal girder light railway bridges

1

1900 - 1900

 

Total for metal road bridges

2068

1860 – 2000

 

Total on database

3609

1860 – 2000

 

 

Metal Road Bridge Classes

Large Classes

o                 Class VII – RSJ, UBM and welded steel girders – 50% of all metal bridges

o                 Class V – Riveted Steel plate girders

o                 Class III – Miscellaneous steel , includes 182 steel rail deck bridges (recycled rail line)

o                 VI, VIIb & VIII - Truss Bridges -a small but significant group.

 

Material

Overall

Trusses

%

Timber

793

12

1.5

Riveted metal

242

26

10.7

RSJ/Welded steel

1635

12

0.7

All timber/metal

2839

50

1.7

Economic and geographic influences, (solutions to difficult crossings)  larger proportion of riveted trusses – design and materials correspond in  time


Age of surviving bridges

There is a particularly strong correlation between surviving numbers of bridges and age, with more than 85% of metal road bridges dating to post 1930, while approximately 75% of timber road bridges are from the same period. The breakdown of metal and timber bridges according to broad age categories is shown in Error! Reference source not found..

Primary factors in bridge survival are the original design life of the bridge (many early timber bridges for example were only ever intended as temporary bridges), and the greatly increased load requirements that were introduced with the advance of heavy motor traffic. The 1930s was a watershed in this respect, with the hiatus caused by the depression and Second World War producing a clear demarcation between the earlier bridges created for the horse drawn era, and those after, being designed for motorised vehicular traffic.

o      Oldest surviving metal bridge is 1860 Hotham Street, or 1861 Hawthorn)

o      More than 85% of surviving metal road bridges are post 1930

=      Depression, hiatus

=      post-war expansion,

=      CRB standard designs,

=      availability of Australian RSJs

o       c.30 bridges are pre 1880

o      123 (5%) of Bridges are 19th century


o      Variable cut-off for old bridges based on material/structure type – George has more on this

 

Location


. Generally the pattern of metal road bridges reflects the settled and developed areas of Victoria, and concentrations of populations (see Error! Reference source not found.a & b). The Melbourne, North East, Western and Central Regions account for the greatest numbers of metal road bridges. Particular concentrations can be found in Melbourne and around Geelong and Ballarat. The Geelong-Ballarat concentration is of note as this includes a number of important early wrought iron bridges. It is likely that the role of these towns in the development of metal manufacture and engineering was an influence in the construction of bridges in the region.

Another concentration of metal road bridges around Ararat and Stawell is a reflection of the significant number of post World War Two bridges constructed using recycled rail following the closure of several local railways. These bridges can conceivable be considered as an alternative to the more common reinforced concrete bridges which became common in the same period.

The north west of the state, by contrast has few metal road bridges. This is probably due to the absence of large rivers needing crossings, and to the relatively late development of this region, with most of the permanent road bridges only being constructed from around the middle of the twentieth century.

·        The distribution of nineteenth century bridges closely matches the pattern of important communication routes to the Western District in that period, the Murray and its crossings, the Central Goldfields and the roads connecting the major sea ports to the hinterland.Wide distribution

·        Major groups

o      19th century pattern reflects routes and crossings

o      Murray River crossings – engineering challenges

o      Geelong and Bendigo Railways – short span solutions following mason’s strike?

o      Geelong – Ballarat, Alsop’s legacy

o      Melbourne – Yarra crossings and  scale of construction

o      Ararat Rail in slab – local engineer

o      Few in Alps (timber) or northwest (later concrete)

 

Map of bridges

 

Dimensions

Bridges over 50m in overall length and with spans greater than 20 metres account for lest than 20% of metal or timber bridges, whole those over 100 m overall of with spans more than 30 metres account for less than 5% of the respective metal and timber bridges. When assessed against similar age groups, it is evident that longer bridges form a larger proportion of the surviving nineteenth century bridges. This reflects two factors in the history of bridge building. The shorter span bridges tended to be constructed to lesser standards, often as temporary timber structures with short life spans, and so most have been reconstructed in metal or concrete in the twentieth century (generally post Second World War). Longer span bridges, conversely, were required to be more substantial structures with higher engineering and design standards, while the much greater initial investment has ensured they have been maintained in use because of the cost of replacement.

The major characteristic the age and length distribution is the consistent proportions of bridges across each of the age and material categories, within the dimension ranges, indicating a regular process of replacement. It would be interesting to compare these with data for reinforced concrete structures, which are almost entirely a post-1900 structural type. It might be anticipated that a flatter distribution of lengths over time would be found or even that the proportion of longer bridges increases among the more recent groups. However, this comparison has not been possible due to the lack of available data on concrete bridges.

·        Span length and overall length

·        measure of technical achievement

·        ranking within structural types

·        Longer spans are larger proportion of 19th century structures – greater attrition of shorter old bridges

·        Critical dimensions <30 m span (10% of bridges, >50 m length (7% of bridges)

·        Data incomplete for about 20% of records.

Recommendations

·        Potential 40 for addition to Victorian Heritage Register

·        308 metal road bridges of local or above significance

·        Stage 2– detailed assessment of significant bridges

·        Expand to cover other gaps –

o      Railway bridges

o      Reinforced concrete bridges (supplement Monash study)

o      Masonry and Brick bridges

·        Research, Education, Interpretation and data management

 


 


 





Quantitative criteria for assessment of significance

 

 

Objectives of Quantitative Criteria

·        Systematic and objective method of providing information to assist in assessing cultural significance

·        Provide a means of comparing bridges within groups (eg: age, type)

·        Criteria are used in conjunction with Heritage Victoria Criteria, Burra Charter

·        Leads to more robust and objective decisions as to whether a particular bridge should be considered for heritage listing, and if so should it be listed at State, Regional or Local level?

 

 

The Criteria

·        Age

·        Length / Height

·        Structure Type

·        Historical

·        Social

·        Aesthetic

 

Origins

·        Former National Trust Bridges Committee

·        USA (West Virginia)

·        Prof Colin O’Connor

·        Current committee and consultants

Age

 

·        Different types of bridges are assessed for different age ranges: relative age of a bridge within its own category is significant

·        Factors used to determine age ranges:

o      Size of total population

o      Length of time type was used

o      How many of the type survive

·        Other factors are assessed in other criteria:

o      eg rarity, historic context, etc

 


 

Age: early example of structural type

Riveted

RSJ

Welded Plate

Variable Plate

Rail in Slab

Score

Pre 1880

Pre 1920

Pre 1940

Pre 1955

Pre 1910

3

1880-90

1920-30

1940-45

1955-60

1910-20

2

1890- 1914

1930-40

1945-55

1960-65

1920-30

1

 

Length / Height

·        Length / height relate to how the engineers of the day solved the technical problems of the particular bridge, ie the available technology and engineering know-how

 

Overall length / span length / height
for bridge of its type and age:

Score

Outstanding

3

Noteworthy

2

Significant

1

Typical

0

 

Age

Span length

Overall bridge length

Total No of bridges

 

over 20m

over 25m

over 30m

over 50m

over 100m

over 150m

 

1850-1900

14%

12%

10%

22%

14%

7%

206

1900-1930

14%

11%

8%

25%

12%

8%

193

1930-2000

6%

3%

1.5%

13%

4%

1.5%

1674

·        More early bridges of longer spans survive

·        More later bridges are smaller spans

·        Standard RSJs introduced in 1930

Structure Type

·        Rarity

·        Integrity

·        Place in historical development of bridge engineering (eg riveting, welding, composite decks)

·        Important or unusual details

 

 

Score

Outstanding, rare example of its type exhibiting many original features and details

3

Good, relatively rare example of its type exhibiting some original features and details

2

Good example of its type but modified

1

 

·        Rare types: truss, suspension, metal arch, box girder bridges

·        Prototypes and one-off forms - special cases

·        Outstanding examples of common types identified as well

Historical Issues / Themes

·        Settlement & communication: route, river crossing site, development of towns
(eg gold rush routes, Murray River crossings, etc)

·        Role of individuals:
(eg: associations with significant engineers, builders, contractors, development of engineering standards)

·        Association with significant historical events (eg the Victorian Centenary)

 

Historical

Level of Significance

Score

Settlement and Communication, Route & Site

State

3

Regional

2

Local

1

Designer / Engineer Builder

State

3

Regional

2

Local

1

Historical Event

State

3

Regional

2

Local

1

 

Social Issues / Themes

·        Importance to the present community

·        Role of the bridge in commemorating local events, in the development of the community, for example by linking settlements, joining farmers to the town, etc

·        Often the bridge is a landmark as the entrance to a town and a focus of community activity such as the local fishing spot or swimming hole

 

Level of Significance

Score

State

3

Regional

2

Local

1

 

Aesthetic Values

·        Design of the bridge: proportions, balance of design, stonework, decoration

·        Setting: views, landscape, relation to streetscape, etc

·        Engineering qualities as an expression of the design forces and function

 

 

Score

Noteworthy proportions and details in highly aesthetic site context leading to high aesthetic appeal

3

Reasonable proportions and details in reasonably aesthetic site context leading to medium aesthetic appeal

2

Typical unremarkable bridge in remarkable aesthetic and historic site context

1

Typical unremarkable bridge in unremarkable aesthetic and historic site context

0

 

9 Sample Bridges

·        Methodology tested on 9 bridges. 
Some of known State significance,
others on borderlines.

Bridge

Over

Date

Score

Significance

Gisborne-Kilmore Road

Melbourne-Bendigo Railway

1859 C

17

State

Gonn Crossing Bridge (Murrabit Bridge)

Murray River

1926

17

State

MacRobertson Bridge (Grange Road)

Yarra River & Monash Freeway

1934

20

State

McCoy's Bridge
Murray Valley Highway

Goulburn River

1941

8

Local

Spencer Street Bridge

Yarra River

1930

19

State

Mollison Street Bridge
Kyneton-Trentham Road

Campaspe River

1884

16

State

Hawthorn Bridge

Yarra River

1861

20

State

Russell's Bridge
Maude Road

Moorabool River

1920 (1859)

10

Local ?Regional? 

Yendon - Egerton Road

Moorabool River West Branch

1930s (1870s)

13

Regional

·        Scoring matches well with non-quantitative assessment.  Cumulative score gives good approximation to significance

 

Significance

Range

Significance

Range

State

19-24

Local

7-12

Regional

13-18

Minimal

0-6

·