home | law links | legal levity | law notes | other links | sample documents | costs | plain language


Chapter 5

Options


The Unspeakable Law: As soon as you mention something...
if it's good, it goes away; if it's bad, it happens.

Conveyancing Table of Contents

In this chapter
  1. (a) Generally
    (b)
  2. (a) Generally
    (b)
    (c)

1.	Generally

To the rule that an offer may be revoked at any time before acceptance, an 
option to purchase, if given for valuable consideration, stands as an 
exception. An option is an offer made by one person ( the grantor) to sell 
and to another (the grantee) which that other is entitled to convert into a 
concluded contract of purchase on giving the prescribed notice, and 
otherwise complying with the conditions required for the exercise of the 
option. The offer, if valuable consideration for it is given by the offeree, is 
not revocable within the period stated in the option.

An option should contain by inclusion or by reference all the terms and 
conditions of the agreement, which exercise of the option will conclude, as 
well as stipulating the method of exercise and laying down the conditions 
required for exercise of the option. It is possible to annex a draft of the 
contract for sale of land that will be entered into to the option agreement.

The grantee of an option must give particular attention to the method of 
exercising the option as the procedure is sometimes technical and must be 
strictly adhered to if the option is to be validly exercised. The notice of 
exercise of the option will generally need to be be given in writing. If the 
notice is to be served on the registered office of the grantor an Australian 
Securities Commission search should be obtained to locate the registered 
office at the time of the exercise of the option. If the notice of exercise is to 
addressed to two registered proprietors do not address it to just one. If it 
requires that a copy document executed by the grantee be attached to the 
notice do not rely on the document previously having been handed over. 
Above all the option must be exercised within time even though the parties 
may be negotiating a new agreement.

An option has been held to be a disposition of an interest in land within the 
provisions of s. 54A of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 and thus it must be in 
writing. An options terms must also be stated with certainty for it to be 
enforceable.

It should be noted that without granting an option it is possible for the 
owner of a property to grant a right of first refusal to another person. 
That is, the owner will offer the property to that person at the best price 
offered and allow that person to either buy the property at that price or 
refuse to purchase the property.


2.	Effect of vendor disclosure legislation

Regulation 6(2)(b) of the Conveyancing (Vendor Disclosure & Warranty) 
Regulation, 1986 provides that exempt is:-

	"...a contract arising from the exercise of an option where, by the 
terms of the option, the option was capable of being exercised only 
after the expiration of 3 months from the date it was granted" 

The question in practitioners minds was whether a contract annexed to an 
option had to contain vendor disclosure documents required by s. 52A of 
the Conveyancing Act, 1919 and the Conveyancing (Vendor Disclosure and 
Warranty) Regulation, 1986 particularly where, following the exercise of an 
option, the parties were obliged to enter into a contract for sale in the form 
annexed to the option. This question was resolved to some extent by Todd 
v. Georgievski1 where it was held that the vendor disclosure requirements 
of s. 52A of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 and the Conveyancing (Vendor 
Disclosure and Warranty) Regulation, 1986 did not apply to options but did 
apply to a contract for sale arising from the exercise of an option unless the 
option was capable of being exercised only after the expiration of 3 
months from the date it was granted.

By contrast with the "cooling-off" legislation2 the "vendor disclosure and 
warranty" legislation applies to all land with very few exceptions. The 
"cooling-off" legislation relates only to "residential land" as it is defined in 
that legislation.


3.	Effect of now repealed Anti-Gazumping (Preliminary Agreement) 
Legislation

This legislation ceased operation on the 1st October, 1990. Up until then 
66U of the Conveyancing Act provided:

	"An option granted on or after the appointed day (1st June, 1988) 
for the purchase of residential property is void if it is exercisable 
within 30 days after it is granted or, if a different period is 
prescribed, within that period."

The legislation did not apply to a sale of residential property that 
resulted from the exercise of an option that was not void under s. 66U. 
Section 66U made invalid any option which was for a period of up to 30 
days and was exercisable within 30 days. Accordingly preliminary 
agreements strictly did not apply to options and contracts formed on 
exercise of options, because short term options were invalidated and long 
term options were exempted.

Accordingly, if an option was not exercisable for three months, the 
requirements for vendor disclosure and warranty did not apply to the 
contract. However, if an option were not exercisable within 30 days but 
exercisable within three months, the contract (but not the option itself) 
needed to comply with the disclosure and warranty regulation, otherwise the 
contract would be rescindable by the purchaser.


4.	Effect of 1989 (Cooling Off)Amendments

There is now a 5 day cooling-off period for options3 relating to 
residential properties as for contracts for sale4. The cooling off period 
commences when the option is granted and ends on the fifth business day 
after the day on which the option was granted.5 The cooling-off period can 
be extended, shortened or excluded similarly to the provisions dealing with 
contracts for sale6. There is no cooling-off period when the option is 
granted on the same day as the property was offered for sale by public 
auction but passed in, or if a certificate is given to the vendor at or before 
the option is granted, that complies with s. 66ZF. 

Section 66ZC makes provisions relating to a certificate excluding or 
shortening the cooling-off period are effectively identical to those contained 
in Div. 8 of Pt. 4. The mode of rescission during cooling-off7 and the 
consequences of rescission8 are similar to the provisions relating to 
contracts for the sale of residential property.

Division 9 of Part 4 creates new restrictions on the grant of options for the 
purchase of residential properties. It adopts several of the provisions 
contained in Div. 8 Pt. 4 applying to contracts for the sale of residential 
properties. The formal requirements of options now are:-

(a)	An option is void unless it is signed in duplicate by both 
parties9. This is to ensure that the grantee also signs the option 
and that each party should have a signed copy.

(b)	Vendors who by written or broadcast advertisement offer to grant 
an option to purchase residential property are required to have 
available for inspection the draft option or agreement, the 
contract and the disclosure documents10. There is a similar 
requirement for estate agents11.

(c)	The option is void if it is exercisable within 42 days after it is 
granted12. In view of the cooling-off entitlement the rationale or 
need for this provision is questionable. Most residential options are 
likely to be relatively lengthy, subject to subdivision, development 
or building approvals.

(d)	The option document must contain a statement in the prescribed 
form relating to the cooling-off13. Failure to do so entitles the 
purchaser to rescind the option and the resultant contract. This 
requirement should not be overlooked, as it must appear in the 
option, which most solicitors prepare for the specific transaction.

(e)	The option document should have attached to it a copy of the 
proposed contract for sale and the documents required to be 
attached to the contract under s. 52A of the Conveyancing Act 14, 
otherwise the option may be rescinded by either party. The party 
which should have this entitlement to rescind is the grantee 
(purchaser), although it is not unreasonable in favour of grantors 
when the grantee prepares the option e.g.. when a developer 
approaches a private landowner for an option.

Regulations may provide prescribed terms, conditions and warranties in 
options, including those contained in regulations made for the purposes of 
s. 52A of the Conveyancing Act15. To evaluate these option provisions the 
regulation would need to be considered.

It is understood that there will be no form of option prescribed by the 
government unless that course becomes necessary due to abuses of the 
system16.


5.	Stamp duty on options

Stamp duty is payable on the value of the option or the consideration paid 
for the option, whichever is the greater17. That is, the value of the option is 
what is taken into account and not the underlying property the subject of the 
option. By way of concession, the duty payable on any agreement "made in 
pursuance of and by the exercise of the option" is reduced by the amount of 
the ad valorem duty paid on the agreement creating the option18.

However, care must be taken if the option agreement is varied. If A grants 
an option to B to buy land for $ 10 million. The option fee is $ 1 million 
and the initial option period is three months. Then the period is extended by 
one month for a further option fee of $ 100,000.00. The option is exercised 
by notice in writing just prior to the end of the four month period. The duty 
on the option agreement is $ 40,490 based on the $ 1 million option fee. 
Duty on the variation instrument is $ 1,990 based on the $ 100,000 option 
fee. Duty on the notice of exercise of the option would be $ 533,500 based 
on the $ 10 million purchase price (duty $ 535,490) less the credit of 
$ 1,990 i.e. not a credit of $ 40,490, nor of $ 40.490 plus $ 1,990.



1	(1987) 10 NSWLR 319.
2	Also the former "preliminary agreement" legislation.
3	In Snape v. Kiernan3 it was held that the cooling-off provisions of 
the Land Sales Act, 1964 may be availed of by the grantor of an 
option. This interpretation of the Land Sales Act was based on the particular 
wording of the that Act which did not refer to "purchaser" 
as such. The cooling-off provisions of the Land Sales Act have now been 
repealed as part of the "anti-gazumping" reforms of 1988. 
The 1989 "cooling-off" legislation contains separate provions that apply to 
options.
4	Section 66ZB Conveyancing Act, 1919.
5	Ibid s. 66ZB(2-3).
6	Ibid s. 66ZB(4-6).
7	Ibid s. 66ZD.
8	Ibid s. 66ZE.
9	Ibid s. 66ZG(1)(a).
10	Ibid s. 66R(2).
11	Section 84AA(2)(3) of the the Property Stock & Business Agents 
Act, 1941.
12	Section 66ZG(1)(b) Conveyancing Act, 1919.
13	Ibid s. 66ZH(1).
14	Ibid s. 66ZI(2).
15	Ibid s. 66ZA.
16	Anti Gazumping Legislation by David De Carvalho & Bill 
Macquarie, The New Conveyancing Legislation 90/1, The College of Law 
Continuing Legal Educatin 1990, p. 43.
17	Section 40A Stamp Duties Act, 1920.
18	Section 40A(2) Stamp Duties Act, 1920.

HomeThe law-on-computer home page.

home | law links | legal levity | law notes | other links | sample documents | costs | plain language

Envelope

Dan O'Keefe
danok@ozemail.com.au P.O. Box 1127, DUBBO, N.S.W., Australia, 2830
Tele: (068) 82 1433 (BH) Int: 61 68 82 1433 Fax: (068) 81 8117
Revised: 29th September, 1996
URL: http://www.ozemail.com.au /~danok