Coming to terms with Judas (Hints 5)

Acts 1:15-26

In those days Peter stood up among the brethren (the company of persons was in all about a hundred and twenty), and said, "Brethren, the scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David, concerning Judas who was guide to those who arrested Jesus. For he was numbered among us, and was allotted his share in this ministry. (Now this man bought a field with the reward of his wickedness; and falling headlong he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their language Akel'dama, that is, Field of Blood.) For it is written in the book of Psalms, 'Let his habitation become desolate, and let there be no one to live in it'; and 'His office let another take.' So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us--one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection." And they put forward two, Joseph called Barsab'bas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthi'as. And they prayed and said, "Lord, who knowest the hearts of all men, show which one of these two thou hast chosen to take the place in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas turned aside, to go to his own place." And they cast lots for them, and the lot fell on Matthi'as; and he was enrolled with the eleven apostles.

In a Nutshell

Peter stands up and makes an announcement about Judas who, by this time, had died at his own hand. Someone else had to be appointed in his place and Matthias was chosen. 

 

Questions

Why was it necessary to appoint a replacement to Judas? What was going on here?

 

Passages like this will always sound strange because this is a report from a place and time very different from our own. We say they had a "different culture" from us. The apostles and Jesus' family were to wait in Jerusalem. But note how they wait. Look at how they conducted themselves. Luke says there was a large-ish group - 120 in all. He writes that Peter "stood up in their midst". This suggests a meeting of some kind where important decisions had to be made. (A synagogue service on the other hand saw the presiding rabbi sitting to teach. Here Peter stands.) It may be that when Jesus commanded them to "wait in Jerusalem" the apostles and Jesus' family took that to mean that they should go ahead and form their own synagogue in the nation's capital. This seems to be borne out later in the book. Peter's task on this occasion was not easy. It would take some time to consider what had happened and how they were to respond. One of their own had betrayed Jesus. The eleven had to face that. The treachery of Judas was not the end. Jesus had risen. But now there were only 11 apostles and Peter led their deliberation by reference to the Psalms. As a group they seem to have been singing the Psalms with new understanding ever since their arrived in Jerusalem with Jesus riding on a donkey. Maybe Luke has given us Peter's summary of what the group discussed. It must have been a very sad occasion, but Luke reminds us that "life went on" even as they waited according to Jesus' command.

Why a new apostle? Luke seems to be saying that they had no choice. Was it because 12 was the legal number for maintaining a synagogue? Quite possibly. They knew the kind of person they wanted and it seems Matthias was chosen according to the customary way of making appointments.

< Previous  Home  Next >