How the
US-Australia relationship has been weakened by the war in Iraq
Public Justice Report has recently drawn attention to the idealism and ideology implicit in
the US government's National Security Strategy (NSS). [see the PJR discussions:
US National Security
Strategy and Reader's responses]. Bob Goudzwaard detects
an idolatrous motif at work in this rationale for military action and
international diplomacy. When "the question of whether the means are just
[is] pushed aside by insisting that the means are necessary"
then a government has taken a path which makes state power into an idol; this
path excludes rigorous self-examination by all involved in the national
policy-making process.
This provides an important insight for an analysis of the way international
relationships are formed. I want to develop this discussion in relation to one
specific dimension of the recent military conflict: I want to draw attention to
a significant change that has occurred in the Australia-US friendship.
It shows a lack of genuine national self-respect on both sides. This
relationship, like all friendships, has a complex structure with various
levels, and there are many and varied demands made upon all those who are
parties to it. To follow Goudzwaard: no friendship is firmly based when
self-examination is excluded. One way to short-circuit a friendship is to act
within the friendship as if it is necessary, as if it is just there, something
that does not require our ongoing self-examination. The strength of the US-Australia
friendship to date has indeed been in the manner in which participants
from both sides have freely encouraged each other's contribution to the world
community of nations in a spirit of forthright and mutual self-examination. It
has been a taken-for-granted aspect of US-Australian relationships in a variety
of social contexts. As a result this "multi-lateral" relationship has
also enabled Americans and Australians to join in efforts for a just world for
all peoples in a variety of ways. Think, for example, of co-operation in the
United Nations. There are always more things to do and good friends think up
new ways to get them done - together. Good friends know that there is much more
to it than nice words, orchestrated handshakes and warm embraces. If long-established
friendships, as much as new ones, are going to negotiate new and complex
situations they need to be open to new challenges. Friends find the paths of
justice and peace via mutual friendly criticism. And that's why we
should expect that an ongoing friendship between two nations demands mutual self-examination.
When national political leaders seek to give a new form to an old
nation-to-nation relationship, as they must from time to time, they can not be
content with cliché and congratulatory headlines. They have to help each other
by being open to new responsibilities that are emerging in the context of that
new form of relationship. This is what an ongoing friendship is all about. It
is forged in self-examination and develops a mutual self-respect. Both elements
are vital if friendship is to truly serve both parties and promote justice.
International friendships require both parties to rightly and frankly reckon
with the challenges that are present in the other party's situation.
Australia needs to respect the US's changing role but it cannot do so
without developing a new self-respect for its own new role. Whenever
Australia's foreign policy is assessed its peculiar geographic position needs
to be kept in mind. Lying to the north of the Southern Ocean and Antarctica, it
is at the southern end of South East Asia with Indonesia its largest neighbour
to the north. To the east across the Tasman Sea are the South West Pacific
island states of Melanesia, Micronesia, Polynesia and New Zealand. The expansive
Indian Ocean is to the west.
Since a new form has been given to our military relationship with the
US, the Australian Government has allowed its role in the region to assume a
new shape. Regional relationships are no longer exactly as they were, even as
our task to seek justice remains undiminished. Clearly the USA and the UK, the
major parties of "the coalition of the willing" could have acted as a
duo had Australia not made it a threesome. But it still has not been explained
how or why the Australian Government decided that Australian troops had to join
the coalition. Some observers suggest that the explanation is extrinsic to the
military and political situation in Iraq. They believe that the Australian
Government joined the coalition in order to give added weight to its desire for
a free trade pact with the US whether Weapons of mass destruction could be
found or not. It is reported that the New Zealand Prime Minister holds this
view. It may clarify the decision of the Australian Government but it exposes
an idolatrous dimension of Australian Government policy-making - the necessity
of the free market - and the policy assumes our own economic interest is
necessary for the region.
Iraq was already under intense international scrutiny. Australia was not
being threatened with attack either directly or indirectly. And when the US
President and the Australian Prime Minister announced that Australian troops
would join the US led "coalition of the willing", they were
by-passing further UN action. They said it was an expression of our long-term
friendship. But the long-established military aspect to the multi-lateral
US-Australia friendship does not actually explain Australian participation in
the war. Whatever weapons Iraq may have held, it posed no immediate military
threat to Australia's security. If the friendship between Australia and the US
was somehow at risk the threat did not come from Saddam Hussein's regime.
The problem with some misalliances, as we know, comes with the rush, the
hasty manner in which a union is contracted. We also know that hastily
contracted alliances usually involve complex power plays on other fronts.
(Recently, in Australia, we have seen such a scenario played out with the
crisis that derived from an obviously unwise appointment when a senior Anglican
churchman was invited to take the office of Governor-General). But in the case
of US-Australian relations after the Iraqi war we are now left with a new
form of military alliance which has an enormous potential to reshape other
levels of our nation-to-nation friendship. Both governments have failed to
adequately explain their view of the newly formed kind of military alliance that their commitment has
brought into being. To return to Goudzwaard again: they have allowed their
policies and subsequent actions to express a presumed necessity at the
expense of an open and self-critical mutual search for justice. This
action has enormous implications not just for US-Australian friendship, but
also for Australia's relations with its neighbours and friends in the region.
In their rush to make something out of a well-established friendship the
friendship has been transformed into significantly new ways which
they mutually did not talk about and still have not explained. We should
not be surprised that at some later stage, perhaps around the time that a free
trade deal is signed, that a mutual embarrassed evasiveness will characterize
Australia-US relations in this region. A valid international friendship has
been put at risk because the friendship has lost its openness. The friendship
is rendered ambiguous in important respects and Australia is now more of a
regional misfit than before. (The term 'regional misfit' is not mine - it is
the considered view of a former senior and prominent Australian diplomat to
Asia).
Strategic "risk assessments" prior to the deployment of
Australian troops did not consider the impact upon the Australian-US
friendship. That miscalculation occurred because of a determination to avoid
the "just war" question. Instead it was said to be integral to our
"national interest". Much more can be said and the full impact upon
US-Australian multi-lateral relations is yet to be fully worked out. But it
will require ongoing and careful scrutiny. Clearly what is necessary now is for
this country to find the path of genuine repentance, turning from the
presumptions of necessity, a disavowal of all idolatry, military, political and
economic, with a recommitment to the search for authentic public justice in
international relations. Such self examination is also needed if the
US-Australian friendship is to grow as it should. With God's help that can
still happen of course since the way is still open for nations like ours to
help each other seek justice and walk humbly with God also in this part of the
globe.
June 2003 © Christian
Radical Reflections, is written by Bruce C Wearne (PhD), 29 Lawrence
Rd., Point Lonsdale Vic 3225 AUSTRALIA, 61-3-5258-3913. Each edition
may be photocopied or retransmitted in its entirety but not otherwise
reprinted or transmitted without permission. This personal project aims to
encourage positive Christian citizenship, the development of policies and
political attitudes that better express our love for God and our
neighbour. Your comments are welcome. Email can be sent to bcwearne@ozemail.com.au . http://members.ozemail.com.au/~bcwearne/index.html